Max' Notizen

To-Do's Bachelorarbeit

📝 Zuletzt geändert: (vor 1 Monat)📊 467 Wörter

To-Do’s Bachelorarbeit

Auto-collected from all thesis files. Run /thesis-assistant to refresh.

Open Tasks (auto-collected)

Phase 3 – Discussion (highest priority)

  • 5.1.4 A Supramodal Prefrontal Architecture — draft exists in 5.1 Scrapbook (line 75–79); move/refine into main text section (currently just “text” placeholder)
  • 5.2 Re-evaluating the auditory where stream — body is rough placeholder; write full prose on FEF=spatial, 55b=how/motor, how vs where split, Hickok & Poeppel sensorimotor integration
    • 55b vs FEF erklären
    • Theorie aufstellen: FEF mehr spatial, 55b mehr language/motor
    • How vs Where distinction argumentieren
  • 5.3 Re-evaluating the auditory what stream — completely empty; write core argument for IFJa/semantic/object-identity re-evaluation
    • Core Argument definieren
    • Discussing Rolls et al. (2023) groups, IFJa vs 44/45/47l
  • 5.4 Anatomical Ambiguities — main text empty; scrapbook has good A4/A5 paragraph → integrate
    • A4/A5 ambiguity (Rolls vs. our data — already drafted in scrapbook)
    • PSL and STSdp discussion
    • How language (55b, fOP) and where (FEF, parietal) could integrate
  • 5.5 Predictive Modelling — empty; meeting notes add three specific supervisor points
    • Negative prediction (dorsal submodel R=−0.15) erklären
    • Ceiling effect in left hemisphere bei behavioral prediction (language story acc)
    • Offline tasks vs online tasks (im fMRI scanner) — Titel raussuchen und diskutieren
  • 5.6 Hemispheric Lateralization — file does not exist yet; mentioned in outline
    • Left hemisphere: Bestätigung von Hickok & Poeppel (2007)
    • Right hemisphere: Bestätigung von Frühholz (2015) und Griffiths et al. (1998)
  • 5.7 Limitations — partial draft exists; needs polish + one more point
    • BrainRest: nicht erwähnen, aber sagen welche Analysen gemacht wurden
  • 5.8 Future Directions — only heading exists; write sections on MEG directionality + effective connectivity

Supervisor Feedback (Meeting 22.04.2026)

  • BrainRest: nicht explizit erwähnen — stattdessen erklären, welche Analysen gemacht wurden (→ Methods oder Limitations)
  • Negative prediction erklären (dorsal submodel Place task, R=−0.15) → 5.5
  • Ceiling in left hemisphere bei behavioral prediction (language story acc) → 5.5
  • Offline tasks vs online tasks im fMRI-Scanner — Titel des passenden Papers raussuchen → 5.5
  • Soyuhos & Baldauf (Human Brain Mapping) — PPA/FFA paper lesen und schauen ob relevant
  • In Methods schreiben dass das Vorgehen ähnlich zu Soyuhos paper (PPA/FFA) ist → 3.x

Methods / Results (minor)

  • In 3.x erwähnen dass Methode analog zu Soyuhos paper (PPA/FFA, Human Brain Mapping)
  • 5.1.md line 53: -> und hier nochmal single seed 55b anschauen — check if this is still needed or if 4.5 covers it

Writing & Language

  • Abstract schreiben (last — after all sections done)
  • 5.2 title capitalisation: “auditory where stream” → check consistency across all files

Completed Tasks

  • 5.1.1 The FEF as an Auditory-Spatial Controller — written
  • 5.1.2 The IFJa as a Semantic-Auditory Controller — written
  • 5.1.3 The How-Stream: FEF, 55b, and Auditory-Motor Integration — written
  • Introduction — draft complete
  • Theoretical Background — draft complete
  • Methods — draft complete
  • Results — draft complete

see also

0.1 Outline Bachelorarbeit | 0.0 BA Compiled
Created: 30. Apr 26