Outline 5.2 Re-evaluating the auditory where stream
- how and where
- how pathway could be similar to the language dorsal pathway, because motor interaction is needed for expressing
To-Do’s
- 55b vs FEF erklären
- theorie aufstellen, dass FEF mehr spatial und 55b mehr language ist
- dass beides wichtig ist
- how vs where
- hickok sensorimtoro iuntegration vielleicht mehr 55b
5.2 Re-evaluating the auditory where stream
As Hickock und Poeppel proposed a How pathway which might be the language oatheway rolls talked about
1. Neighboring Areas
The Resulkts frm 4.5 show another dissoctation within the where stream where FEF and 55b share the labour of this stream.
- this could
2. Subheading
Notes & Scrapbook
Hier Dinge abladen, die noch keinen Platz im Text haben, damit der Schreibfluss nicht stoppt.
A significant observation in our validation is the lack of direct partial correlation between the FEF and area 44. While Rolls might label both as dorsal, our analysis suggests a more nuanced functional hierarchy.
- Spatial vs Structural Control: The FEF appreas strictly limited ti the spatial “where” network (7PC, 7Am) while the IFJa manages the entire informational and structural complex of the Broca-area.
- The fact that 44 shows no connectivity to spatial regions as the FEF does, this suggests that the dorsal language stream is functionally distinct from the spatial attention network directed by FEF.